Tragedy Unveiled: Inside the Shocking Radhika Yadav Murder Case – Friend's Claims & Police Probe
Uncover the latest updates in the Radhika Yadav murder case. Her best friend's shocking claims reveal family struggles, while Gurugram police stand by their "open and shut" investigation into the tennis player's tragic death.
Friend's Heartbreaking Claims Unveil Radhika Yadav's Struggle

The tragic murder of 25-year-old tennis player Radhika Yadav has gripped Gurugram, and the police have now concluded their investigation. The case took a significant turn following revelations from Radhika’s close friend, Himaanshika Singh Rajput, shedding light on the family dynamics that may have contributed to the shocking incident.
Friend's Heartbreaking Claims Unveil Radhika Yadav's Struggle
In a series of emotional Instagram posts, Himaanshika Singh Rajput, a fellow athlete and Radhika's self-proclaimed "best friend," shared a distressing account of Radhika's final days. According to Himaanshika, Radhika was living under immense familial pressure and rigid restrictions. She had reportedly "surrendered her desires," agreeing to "whatever family wants her to do" just days before her death.
On Thursday, Radhika was allegedly shot by her 51-year-old father, Deepak Yadav, at their Sushant Lok 2, Sector 52 residence. Deepak Yadav was subsequently produced in court on Friday and remanded to one-day police custody.
Disturbing Allegations: Was the Murder Premeditated?
Himaanshika’s revelations go beyond simply detailing Radhika's struggles. She explicitly claimed that the murder was not a spontaneous act but a "well-thought-out crime," meticulously planned by her father three days in advance. Himaanshika alleged that Deepak Yadav was heavily influenced by individuals envious of Radhika's burgeoning success. These acquaintances, she asserted, taunted him for "living off her," fueling his resentment and contributing to his increasingly controlling behavior.
Himaanshika painted a grim picture of Radhika's deteriorating mental state leading up to her death. "She was completely broken and had simply given up," Himaanshika stated, adding that Radhika had even told her family she was ready to live according to their instructions.
Gurugram Police Stand Firm: "Open and Shut Case"
Despite Himaanshika's poignant social media posts, the Gurugram Police have stated that these online statements are not being considered in their official investigation. A police spokesperson affirmed, "We have sufficient evidence against the accused in this case," dismissing social media claims by stating that "anyone could release videos with such claims."
The police have firmly labeled the matter an "open and shut" case, indicating their confidence in the evidence gathered. They anticipate filing a charge sheet based on robust forensic and testimonial evidence.
Police Uncover Chilling Motive and Evidence
Investigators believe the murder was indeed premeditated, citing a chilling detail: Deepak Yadav had uncharacteristically asked his son to buy milk — a chore he usually performed himself — just moments before allegedly shooting Radhika four times in the back while she was preparing breakfast for her mother on her birthday.
The police have recovered the licensed revolver believed to be the murder weapon, along with four spent cartridges from the scene. During interrogation, Deepak Yadav reportedly confessed to the crime, attributing his actions to intense social pressure and deep-seated resentment. An officer quoted him admitting that "taunts from villagers about living off his daughter’s income and questioning her character disturbed him deeply."
Autopsy Reveals Gruesome Details: Four Bullet Wounds
A postmortem conducted by a board of three doctors revealed the horrific extent of the attack. Radhika sustained four bullet wounds — three in her back and one in her shoulder. This finding clarifies an initial discrepancy, as the FIR for her murder had claimed she was shot thrice.
As accessed by HT, the autopsy further explained that one of the bullets had a "through-and-through trajectory," entering and exiting the body, which likely caused two distinct wound locations and led to the initial confusion in the FIR.